User talk:Vysotsky

This user is a license reviewer on Wikimedia Commons. (verify) This user has file mover rights on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

1674 tattoo

Babel user information
nl-N Deze gebruiker heeft het Nederlands als moedertaal. en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English. de-2 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf fortgeschrittenem Niveau. fr-2 Cette personne dispose de connaissances intermédiaires en français.
Users by language

MAGA

Han van Meegeren (1945)
(valued image),

Archives Archive 8 (2025) Archive 7 (2024) Archive 6 (2023) Archive 5 (2022) Archive 4 (Febr. 2021 - Dec.2021) Archive 3 (May 2020 - Feb. 2021) Archive 2 (July 2019 - May 2020) Archive 1 (May 2010 - July 2019)

Clean-up

• Private property -- Vysotsky (talk) 22:53, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

De Centrale (verzekeringsmaatschappij)

Hallo Vysotsky, heeft deze afbeelding iets te maken met De Centrale (verzekeringsmaatschappij) File:IISG1937.JPG? groet Agaath (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Zeker. Op deze foto uit 1937 staat de oprichter van de Centrale in 1904, Nehemia de Lieme, ook op de achtergrond. De Centrale speelde een belangrijke (financiële) rol in de arbeidersbeweging. Vysotsky (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Zeer interessante figuur, die De Lieme. Ik heb al een tijdje een opzetje voor een artikeltje over hem liggen. Je vraag zorgt ervoor dat ik dat deze maand uitwerk voor de Nederlandstalige Wiki. Dank. Vysotsky (talk) 22:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Dank voor de info. Ik heb zowel op pagina De Centrale (verzekeringsmaatschappij) als op Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis wat info en/of bestanden toegevoegd. groet--Agaath (talk) 21:35, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Enige vertraging wegens drukke andere zaken, maar ik ben het niet vergeten. Vysotsky (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

File:FHM-288690 WW2 Norway 1940-06-19 Nikolaus von Falkenhorst Kurt Treuhaupt Ernst Volckheim Universitetsplassen Oslo Frihedsmuseets fotoarkiv Nationalmuseet Denmark Presse-BiId-Zentrale No known rights.jpg

Hallo Vysotsky, ich habe mal wieder einen mist gebaut. Kan je me dit corrigeren voor me? A billion thanks. Lotje (talk) 15:26, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Hersteld. Vysotsky (talk) 19:24, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

En en passant dit bestand uitgesneden. Vysotsky (talk) 19:34, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Hartstikke bedankt Vysotsky. He spijt me dat ik je hiervoor (weer) moest lastigvallen. Lotje (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

File:, SFA001002561.jpg

Hallo Vystosky, @Gouwenaar: zou te achterhalen zijn wie dit is? Lotje (talk) 11:09, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Makkie. James Bond voor zijn Aston Martin DB5. Vysotsky (talk) 11:11, 5 January 2026 (UThC)

Aardige foto, maar zeker niet gemaakt door Wiel van der Randen, die in 1964 al 15 jaar dood was. De fotograaf is onduidelijk, ook bij de Bettmann Archives, tegenwoordig onderdeel van Getty. Bij Spaarnestad kunnen we het niet meer nakijken; een archiefversie is niet aanwezig. In theorie zou deze foto nog opnieuw bij het Nationaal Archief kunnen opduiken, waar men bezig is met de Spaarnestad Collectie. Ik ben benieuwd of zij wél weten wie de fotograaf is en onder welke licentie de foto dan valt. Vysotsky (talk) 11:37, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Waarschijnlijk is het simpelweg een publiciteitsfoto die door de filmmaatschappij is vrijgegeven. Vandaar ook de ontbrekende naam van de fotograaf. Vysotsky (talk) 11:39, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Ja, dat zal het zijn, een publiciteitsfoto met Roger Moore in action Lotje (talk) 13:41, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Actor Sean Connery, the original James Bond, is pictured here on the set of Goldfinger with one of the fictional spy's cars, a 1964 Aston Martin DB5. Lotje (talk) 13:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

File tagging File:StijnvandeBunt2025.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:StijnvandeBunt2025.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Jcb (talk) 14:41, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

IKO-x2o

I came across one of those uploads and checked in VRT. We did not receive anything. Because it's a whole series, I will give you a few days to sort out what happened. If nothing appears in VRT within a few days, there will be no other option than to tag everything as 'no permission'. Please be aware that the author is typically not a 'team', but a person. Normally permission has to come from that person. This may only be different if the team has an employee with the job of 'photographer'. Jcb (talk) 14:46, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for this comment. 4 years ago, in Dec. 2020, I cooperated with the manager of Team IKO in the same way. The permission letter was sent the day after the uploads, and also acknowledged by the VRT team (@Red-tailed hawk: ) on the same day. The same procedure took place in January 2023 (thank you, @Ciell: ). These actions resulted in a few dozen useful and frequently used new sport photographs. No thanks needed. I have no doubt this will now be handled in the same way. The manager will send the permission letter within a few days. As to your remark about copyright: thanks for that too. I know a bit about Dutch copyright, as you know. In this case my understanding is that Art. 7 of the Dutch Copyright Act is applicable. Vysotsky (talk) 17:03, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Whether article 7 applies or not, will depend on the information as provided in the ticket. But please be aware that the the template you are using states: "An email containing details of the permission for this file has been sent", while, obviously, the permission has not been sent, not yet. So actually it would be completely within procedure if I would tag all the files now with 'no permission'. You know that. So not sure why you are biting, while I gave you, of all people, a bit time to sort things out. Jcb (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

That's funny. When I chose the option "I have permission to upload this from my employer or the creator of this work" I got the following message: The creator of this work or their representative must send a written consent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in order to release this work under a free license. You can use this email generator as template for your email. If the email is not sent within 30 days of upload, this media will be deleted. (Bold text from the Wiki-generated message, not from me.) Instead of biting me, you could at least grant me the official 30 days. Vysotsky (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Well, in that case the upload form contradicts the text at {{Permission pending}}, so one of them should be brought in line with the other. The history behind the 30 days is that is often took long before tickets were handled, to prevent files from being deleted before someone looked at the ticket. Currently we have a bot tagging the files with {{Permission received}} as soon as the ticket comes in, so this is no longer an issue. I will revert the tagging of above mentioned file and start a discussion with the VRT agents to see how we can get this in line. Jcb (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Category:Brothers of Charity of Gent

Hallo Vysotsky, ik heb een vraagje m.b.t. tot de vzw Broeders van Liefde die een nieuwe naam kreeg: "Evara". Heb je er enig idee van hoe dit hier aan te passen zodat iedereen het ook weer terugvindt? Cheers en thanks. Lotje (talk) 16:53, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Ik zie dat een zoekactie in de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia met de term "Evara" netjes doorverwijst naar het artikel Broeders van Liefde. In het artikel zelf wordt de naamswijziging vermeld. Verder heb ik van dit onderwerp weinig verstand, dus ik hou me hier buiten. Vysotsky (talk) 19:52, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

PMRMaeyaert

[1]: I get your point, but it's not just that he's "not expert," it's that he's confidently wrong about the subject. - Jmabel ! talk 04:24, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Help!!!

I did it again, help! overwriting I mean. Vysotsky, ik weet niet hoe ik dit nou weer voor elkaar kreeg. Vroeger had ik dit probleem niet. Kan je mijn error rechtzetten? Thanks a billion. Lotje (talk) 13:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Alles teruggezet naar normaal. Uitsnede met signatuur heb ik als apart bestand opgeladen. Vysotsky (talk) 19:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Hartstikke bedankt voor de "magic" Vysotsky. Lotje (talk) 06:35, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Category:Van der Meer & Schoep

Hallo Vysotsky, @Gouwenaar: het zou mij zeer verbazen als Arij van der Meer hier niet aanwezig zou zijn. Zou dit te achterhalen zijn? Cheers and thanks. Lotje (talk) 06:57, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Mogelijk de man links op deze foto, hij was toen al geen directeur meer van het bedrijf. Zie ter vergelijking deze foto toen hij 65 jaar werd. Gouwenaar (talk) 07:53, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

@Gouwenaar: als het niet met zekerheid vaststaat liever niet toevoegen dus. Cheers Lotje (talk) 08:39, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Category:Letters from Jan Frans Willems Category:Letters by Jan Frans Willems

Zou ik er een potje van gekookt hebben? Ik meende in navolging van Category:Letters by Charles R. Darwin dat dit ook zou hoorde. Graag je advies. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 06:57, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Correct. Dank voor de verbetering. Zie ook Édouard d'Huart. -- Vysotsky (talk) 20:53, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

De Brusselsche Bank in Amsterdam

Hallo Vysotsky, @Gouwenaar: zou te achterhalen zijn of dit iets van doen heeft met de Bank van Brussel. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Het exterieur van de "Brusselsche Bank" in Amsterdam Lotje (talk) 05:41, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Neen, er is geen sprake van een relatie met de Bank van Brussel. De zaak in Amsterdam werd bekend onder de naam de "Brusselsche Bank-affaire", waarbij enkele directeuren van deze Nederlandse (Amsterdamse) bank werden beschuldigd van een 'miljoenenzwendel'. Na hun arrestatie volgde een proces waarna ze werden vrijgesproken. Gouwenaar (talk) 08:12, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

@Gouwenaar: hartstikke bedankt voor de toelichting. Lotje (talk) 04:58, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Ik voegde de category toe aan Amsterdamsche Bank? Lotje (talk) 05:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Dat is niet correct: de 'Brusselsche Bank' in Amsterdam was slechts een bank in Amsterdam en niet de Amsterdamsche Bank. Gouwenaar (talk) 08:09, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Portraits by Isidoor Opsomer This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Isidoor Opsomer, PA08928.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ellywa (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Wethouder van Amsterdam

Hallo Vysotsky, @Gouwenaar: zou te achterhalen of de spelling A.A. Verheij dan wel A.A. Verhey is? Ik tip op Verheij Lotje (talk) 07:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Klopt, zie hier zijn geboorteakte.Gouwenaar (talk) 09:01, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

@Gouwenaar: fijn, dankjewel, maar hoe heb je dit nou kunnen ontcijferen. Lotje (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2026 (UTC)