Jump to content

User talk:Huangdan2060

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago19 comments1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hello, Huangdan2060!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Puji Temple,Ningxiang County Panorama 01.jpg et Puji Temple,Ningxiang County Panorama 02.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

你好，瀏覽維基百科，我看到了你的照片，可以組裝成全景。下面是結果。我希望這是令人滿意的。問候和打招呼來自法國。 （機器翻譯） François de Dijon (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, en parcourant Wikipédia j'ai vu certaines de vos photographies qui pouvaient être assemblées pour former un panorama. Voici le résultat. J'espère que cela vous conviendra. Cordialement et bonjour depuis la France. (traduction par ordinateur) François de Dijon (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply 

File:Puji Temple,Ningxiang County Panorama 01.jpg
File:Puji Temple,Ningxiang County Panorama 02.jpg

File:Shang Liu Temple 3 4 5.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

你好，我加入了其他三個的照片，下面是結果。真心的。。François de Dijon (talk) 10:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, J'ai assemblé trois autres photographies, voici le résultat. Cordialement.

File:Shang Liu Temple 3 4 5.jpg

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
你好 WANGYU782008185 (talk) 10:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

清理Category:Changsha

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

您好！

感谢您的贡献！我注意到您上传过很多湖南的照片，请问是否有兴趣清理Category:Changsha，把这个分类中的照片移动到更准确的分类？我已经移动了不少了。如果阁下感兴趣，可以用hotcat批量操作。--維基小霸王 (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your photo contributions!

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Lacquer bowls of cloud design, Warring States period, Jiangling, Hubei

At the moment, I'm admiring your photo of two Warring States period bowls from Hubei. Wonderful condition! Must have been found in a nice, dry tomb. I added them to the article on Jingzhou, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jingzhou -- where the bowls are on display in the city museum. Best regards, --Pete Tillman (talk) 20:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you.--Huangdan2060 (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Lingshi Henmang

[edit]
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than using the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You did it again in this edit. One more time, and I will be forced to report your actions.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I forgot. Thank you for your warning.--Huangdan2060 (talk) 13:06, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
[edit]
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your guidance.--Huangdan2060 (talk) 10:49, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Slogan for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China 20210611.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Slogan for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China 20210611.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Slogan for the 100th anniversary of the found…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Teetrition (talk) 05:44, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


Category:To Ji-hun

[edit]
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Doclys👨‍⚕️👩‍⚕️ 🩺 • 💉 07:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Mao Yuanxin 1.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Mao Yuanxin 1.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mao Yuanxin 1.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Before 18 years old Bruce Lee.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Before 18 years old Bruce Lee.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Before 18 years old Bruce Lee.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ConcededBear657 (talk) 03:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Bruce Lee and his family 1940s.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Bruce Lee and his family 1940s.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bruce Lee and his family 1940s.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

ConcededBear657 (talk) 03:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Billboard of Xi Jinping in Xiangtan, Hunan, China 20211024.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Billboard of Xi Jinping in Xiangtan, Hunan, China 20211024.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Billboard of Xi Jinping in Xiangtan, Hunan, C…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Redundant Huangguoshu Waterfall photos by Huangdan…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mao Zedong in 1959

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 19:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Clear waters and green mountains slogan, Mount Zhao, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Clear waters and green mountains slogan, Mount Zhao, Xiangtan, Hunan, China.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clear waters and green mountains slogan, Moun…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Li Min and Mao Zedong 1949.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Li Min and Mao Zedong 1949.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Li Min and Mao Zedong 1949.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

261026CQ (talk) 04:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Diao Yu island picture poster.JPG

[edit]
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Diao Yu island picture poster.JPG has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Diao Yu island picture poster.JPG

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Giant billboard of "Learning from Lei Feng" in Changsha.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Giant billboard of "Learning from Lei Feng" in Changsha.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giant billboard of "Learning from Lei Feng" i…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

What I am doing in 2025

[edit]
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have uploaded nearly 20,000 photos, and recently I am organizing duplicate and suspected infringing photos.--Huangdan2060 (talk) 06:29, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Duplicate

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 09:18, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Entrance of Lianhuashan Park1.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Entrance of Lianhuashan Park1.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Entrance of Lianhuashan Park1.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Duplicate

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:45, 1 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Tu Youyou in 1950s.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Tu Youyou in 1950s.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tu Youyou in 1950s.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm doing in late 2025 and 2026

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have recently been examining and handling photos with incidental inclusion of persons. During a certain month in 2025, while I was taking photos of a building, a woman standing in front of it noticed me lifting my phone. She quickly ran up to me, snatched the phone, and said, "You took a photo of me—that violates my portrait rights." The matter ended with me deleting the photo and offering an apology. I hope fellow Chinese Wikimedia Commons editors can learn from my experience. If you happen to capture the face of a recognizable person, always remember to blur it or add a mosaic.--Huangdan2060 (talk) 08:09, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

《中华人民共和国民法典》第一千零一十八条【肖像权定义】“自然人享有肖像权，有权依法制作、使用、公开或者许可他人使用自己的肖像。肖像是通过影像、雕塑、绘画等方式在一定载体上所反映的特定自然人可以被识别的外部形象。”

中华人民共和国民法典》第一千零一十九条【肖像权侵权】“任何组织或者个人不得以丑化、污损，或者利用信息技术手段伪造等方式侵害他人的肖像权。未经肖像权人同意，不得制作、使用、公开肖像权人的肖像，但是法律另有规定的除外。未经肖像权人同意，肖像作品权利人不得以发表、复制、发行、出租、展览等方式使用或者公开肖像权人的肖像。”（未经肖像权人同意，不得制作、使用、公开其肖像，因此，在公共场所拍摄并发布他人肖像，即使没有商业目的，未经同意也可能侵权）

  • 李现自曝：在澳门“扫街”，被路人警告 2025年12月9日 “12月8日，演员李现在个人社交账号发布一组中国澳门扫街照（‘扫街’指‘拿着相机到任意的某条街上去抓拍’），并分享小插曲：被路人警告照片给我删了，不然报警！原来澳门是不能‘玛格南’式拍照的……Actor Li Xian was warned by a passerby to delete a photo or face a police report while taking street snapshots in Macao Special Administrative Region on Monday, drawing attention to the city's strict regulations on photographing individuals in public. Li shared the incident on his personal social media account, expressing surprise that street photography in Macao apparently cannot follow the free-style approach associated with "Magnum photography".”
  • 演员李现“扫街”被警告，街拍能随便拍吗？ 2025年12月12日 “演员李现自述其在澳门‘扫街’摄影时，被路人警告删除照片，‘不然报警’。《法治日报》律师专家库成员、北京京师（兰州）律师事务所党支部书记、合伙人王立功律师，对此作出专业解读。王立功：街拍绝不是想拍就拍、想发就发的无约束行为。根据我国民法典第一千零一十九条，未经肖像权人同意，不得制作、使用、公开肖像权人的肖像。如果摄影师将路人的清晰影像发布到社交平台，则构成了“公开”，涉嫌侵害他人肖像权。另外，如果发布的照片不经意间暴露了他人的私密活动或敏感行踪，可能侵害隐私与个人信息权益。一旦被认定侵权，拍摄者可能需要承担删除照片、赔礼道歉、赔偿损失等法律责任。街拍侵权与否，关键在于：第一，人物是否“可识别”；第二，是否进行了公开传播；第三，即便是出于个人艺术创作等非营利目的，也需要征得被拍摄人同意。当然，法律也规定了若干“合理使用”的例外情况。根据我国民法典第一千零二十条，在某些为公共利益或社会必需的场景下，可以不经肖像权人同意。这主要包括：为实施新闻报道不可避免地被拍摄入镜；为展示特定公共环境（如地标性建筑全景）而不可避免地纳入人物；以及国家机关依法执行公务等。需要特别指出的是，常见的“扫街”摄影、街拍行为，其性质通常难以直接归属于上述“新闻报道”或“展示公共环境”的法定免责情形。因此，摄影师以“艺术”或“纪实”为由进行抗辩，在实践中较难得到法律支持。”
  • 博主无权让路人配合演出 雨馨 2024年11月27日 “随着短视频、直播平台的兴起，我们的生活空间仿佛被无数商业镜头包围，‘被出镜’屡屡引发纠纷。从网友的吐槽来看，除了外出吃饭被拍入探店视频，逛个街也时常遭遇长枪短炮的疯狂‘扫射’，哪怕乘坐地铁、出入机场，一不小心就被打上‘社畜’素材公开示众。即便身处公共场所，哪怕是无甚知名度的‘路人’，肖像权、隐私权都受到严格保护，绝非想拍就拍。《民法典》白纸黑字写得一清二楚，未经肖像权人同意，不得制作、使用、公开肖像权人的肖像，除非是为了实施新闻报道或者维护公共利益或消费者权益等；侵犯肖像权、隐私权者，应承担停止侵权、赔偿损失、赔礼道歉等民事责任。”
  • 逛个街就被发到网上？你的 “随手拍”，或许正侵犯他人权益 2025年12月11日 “很多人认为‘街拍是记录城市风貌，不算侵权’，但从法律实践来看，看似‘习以为常’的街拍行为，可能同时触碰多条权利 ‘红线’。除了本案涉及的肖像权、名誉权，若街拍内容涉及他人私人生活场景，还可能侵犯隐私权；互联网的‘传播放大效应’ 会让侵权后果加倍：一张街拍照经转发、二次创作后，可能引发对被拍摄者容貌、身材、穿着的恶意评论，甚至导致个人身份信息被‘人肉搜索’ 曝光，进而引发网络暴力，严重影响被拍摄者的工作与生活，甚至威胁人身财产安全。本案的审理及判决，不仅为陈女士挽回了权益，也向社会释放了明确信号：街拍自由不能凌驾于他人权益之上，任何组织或个人在进行街拍活动时，都必须遵守法律规定，尊重他人的人格权——‘随手拍’ 之前，先想清楚‘能不能拍’‘能不能发’，才是对他人、对自己的负责。”
  • 街拍岂能 想拍就拍想发就发？ 张立美. 2025年10月31日 “陈女士身着吊带裙，在步行街悠闲散步，不料被一名摄影师拍下，这张照片不仅被传到了一个街拍爱好者微信群中，还被用于摄影展、画册。事后陈女士将摄影师、转发者、传媒公司告上法院。近日，南京鼓楼法院审理认为被告构成侵犯肖像权、名誉权，判被告删除照片、道歉、赔偿损失。”
  • 擅自使用他人的照片作宣传，小心侵权！ 王璐瑾 2025年4月2日 “黄某某是抖音平台的时尚博主，并注册IP账号，该账号的作品是黄某某直播展示服装上身效果、介绍服装特点材质、拍摄模特穿衣的图片及视频效果图。某某百货店在同一平台开设店铺内上架一服装产品，商品链接内使用的是黄某某本人照片，用于商品推广、宣传，该链接无销量。黄某某认为某某百货店侵犯其肖像权，诉至宁陵县法院，请求判令某某百货店立即停止侵权行为、赔礼道歉，并赔偿经济损失及维权合理支出费用4万元。”
[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | кыргызча | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−

Hello Huangdan2060.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

--Yann (talk) 18:22, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your guidance. I will carefully read and understand the copyright regulations. The copyright infringing photos I have found so far are at least 6 years old, and I have not uploaded any copyright infringing photos in recent years. Huangdan2060 (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Yinpenling Supply and Marketing Cooperative 25 February 2023E.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 20 days ago6 comments2 people in discussion
File:Yinpenling Supply and Marketing Cooperative 25 February 2023E.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yinpenling Supply and Marketing Cooperative 2…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−


Hi Huangdan2060. I noticed that a deletion request you made was not done correctly.

This is at least the third time you've been warned about this. Each time you do this, it creates a fair amount of work for other people to clean it up. If you plan to continue nominating files for deletion, you need to learn to do this correctly.

There are several steps to making a deletion request (DR) correctly; among other things you must transclude the deletion into the correct daily DR list, and to notify the page creator and optionally other human (non-bot) editors of the page. By far the easiest way to do all of this correctly is to use the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests, which takes care of all that using vetted Javascript. If you prefer to add the {{Delete}} template or {{Category for discussion}} template manually, you are required to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed). Again, though, there is no need to follow complex instructions if you use the automatic tools.

Also worth knowing: on Commons, {{Delete}} is not a "speedy delete" request like it is on many other projects; instead, it starts a discussion of whether the file should be deleted. If you think a particular media file really obviously does not belong on Commons, see the instructions at Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. Common cases that are better handled with a speedy delete than a DR include:

Common bad reasons people have for making DRs in the first place include:

  • after renaming a category, trying to delete the resulting redirect in violation of policy COM:CATRED
  • making a DR for a file where there is already a current DR
  • trying to delete one's own work within 7 days (use {{G7}} instead)
  • placing {{Delete}} on the deletion subpage itself, or on a talk page.

Also, please don't use {{Ffd}} (that's an English Wikipedia thing).

If you have further questions about the deletion process, you can ask them at COM:Help desk or COM:Village pump.  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:08, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I still don't quite understand which step I missed. Yes, I am using the "Nominate for deletion" option under "Tools" on the left. If I am requesting the deletion of a photo that I uploaded myself, do I still need to notify myself? Just now, due to network issues, the deletion request I submitted didn't show my signature. Huangdan2060 (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Huangdan2060: You didn't create or transclude the subpage. Please check your work so if that happens again with the automatic tool, you can do the steps manually.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:30, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. When I submitted the deletion request, a circular symbol kept spinning on the page of the photo for a few minutes. So I closed the page, and then you came to notify me. Huangdan2060 (talk) 16:36, 10 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome. If that happens again, please file a bug report via mw:How to report a bug.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:55, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
OK. If a bug appears, I will report it. Huangdan2060 (talk) 16:12, 11 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Huangdan2060&oldid=1146093704"