Comments on: David Allen on why sorting your lists by contexts even matters https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters David Allen's GTDĀ® Methodology Thu, 04 Jun 2020 04:19:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Patricia https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-125676 Thu, 04 Jun 2020 04:19:05 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-125676 In reply to Cory Kaufman.

Simply…what he said. I personally work backward from desired Goal, detailed tasks to achieve goal, then I have things sorted as to where they fit my life overall – Personal, Podcast, Mind & Body, etc. That’s working so far and I’ve been tweaking during the pandemic self-isolation so I’ll come out of this more organized than ever before.

]]>
By: Banzo https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2801 Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:16:20 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2801 @LBB : contexts are used to separate your different actions into reasonable chunks. I would not advise you use those contexts for you mail, simply because mail is just something that carries information you have to decide on. When you get email that requires an action, write down the action required in your tasks list, and archive your mail.

If you want to be able to go back to the mail, then you can either print it and put in the folder corresponding to your project, or keep a digital copy (for example by sending your mail directly to your Evernote account, and then giving it the tag corresponding to the project folder you want that mail to be in).

Hope this helps (your feedback would be nice).

]]>
By: LBB https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2800 Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:25:22 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2800 Hi All, I am hoping you can help me with an issue I find confusing:
Is the @context an email folder to file the actual email itself, or a ‘to-do’/next- actions list saved on another program (perhaps with links to the original email,in case the original reference material is needed)?
If the @context is a folder of emails, once the task is completed what happens next? It goes into archive?
Many thanks,
LBB

]]>
By: marco snikkers https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2799 Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:07:57 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2799 I’ve learned by implementing GTD myself, and by coaching others, it really depends what works/feels best for you. If you only have ~20 active tasks (as my customer services peope), 1 list will work. As I’m travelling a lot, have private actions in my system as well, and >100 open actions the above works for me. My marketing person likes to work on specific topics and finish all action from that list, so she has a category ‘@tradeshows.

Kelly is right. as few as you need.

]]>
By: Kelly Forrister https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2798 Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:30:26 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2798 Lucy–

Luke said what I would have: use as many contexts as you need, but as few as you can get by with.

Kelly

]]>
By: Luke https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2797 Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:47:30 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2797 I agree with Cory about minimizing your contexts. Use as many as you need but as few as you can. David’s default list is a good starting point for most people.

At first I had overcategorized and created an unworkable system. I decided to go back to the default list. Over time I added only one specialized category: @Home-Computer. I used to keep these actions on my @Home list, but got tired of hunting for them among actvities like “Clean toilets”.

]]>
By: Lucy https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2796 Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:24:22 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2796 Hi Kelly,

I like the idea of splitting contexts between work and home, particularly when work PCs are not accessible at home for whatever reason. I also have a work mobile and personal mobile, work email and personal email.

Q: Would you recommend splitting contexts in this fashion as well?

]]>
By: Kelly Forrister https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2795 Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:52:50 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2795 Cory & Camilla–

In case this helps, I’ve done loads of GTD seminars for engineering groups and I suggested they looked at splitting contexts by the tools they use or mode they are. For example, many of them would say that doing email was an entirely different mode than coding. So their lists would be split by @email and @Coding or @[name of software they use to code].

I have Computer (my PC at work) and Computer-Personal (my Mac at home). I also have a computer context that’s just for posting content to GTD Connect called To Post. It requires the computer, but it’s a specific thing to do on the computer.

-Kelly

]]>
By: Camilla https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2794 Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:24:00 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2794 I agree with Cory. I work as a programmer and I find it really hard to come up with other contexts for work than @computer. I just keep a next actions list too and maybe an errands one.

]]>
By: Thomas Saar https://gettingthingsdone.com/2010/09/david-allen-on-why-sorting-your-lists-by-contexts-even-matters/#comment-2793 Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:11:53 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=4191#comment-2793 I think its important (as always) not to over-structure. I use omnifocus, and it has posibilites to sub-contexts.

I used them some time but came back to simple contexts, because it took me too much thought where should I put it, like David I am too lazy :)

Seriously it should be simple to sort your list, so 10-20 contexts should be max…

]]>