Comments on: How to weed wack your inbox down to zero https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero David Allen's GTD® Methodology Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:03:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: GTD Times Team https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1015 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:03:06 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1015 True Adam. Just use your best judgment on when to call something a project or not. You generally wouldn’t even bother tracking it, even if it is multiple step, if the whole thing will be off your plate by the next time you do a weekly review anyway.

]]> By: Adam Boettiger https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1014 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:36:14 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1014 “4. If it IS Actionable and will take you multiple steps to complete, ask yourself, “What’s my desired outcome?” Track that outcome on a Projects list.”

Herein lies a bug or problem:

If you’re putting every email that requires more than one step to complete on a Projects List, that projects list can become long and unwieldy within a few days.

Any suggestions?

]]> By: Xox https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1013 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:27:31 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1013 What does the term “actionable” mean in GTD?

Does it mean “ready for use” or “there is a need for an action” or what?

]]> By: Soulfull https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1012 Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:33:53 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1012 I find rules for some messages really helps. Here are some examples from my work as a software developer. I get email for every tracked bug in my product area when the text of the bug changes (~100 per day). I use a rule to put those in a folder and then a review just those a couple of times a day. That lets me sort them by subject and read several changes in a row or by person and see what a particular tester is up to.

My second example is a rule for changes developers check in (~25 per day). I read this folder right before I get a new copy of the code to what changes I am picking up. That is really as soon as I need this information and it is easier to absorb in this just in time fashion.

In both cases my rules have exceptions for forwards and replies sent directly to me because sometimes those are questions directed at me.

]]> By: Gil Friend https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1011 Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:23:34 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1011 “1. Do it now (if it will take less than 2 minutes)”
But what if there are 100+ emails a day in that category? That’s 3+ hours. (And suggests a larger problem.)
“2. Delegate it”
It’s hard to see how to delegate email (tho Tim Ferriss insists that’s the way). How do you advise going about that?
“3. Defer it”
That’s what happens to so much of it, which never gets gotten back to. (See #1)

So: What do you suggest when the problem seems to be the sheer quantity, not just mail management practices?

]]> By: Gil Friend https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1010 Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:19:08 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1010 The very handy Smart Folders in Mac Mail mean you shouldn’t have to create copies of messages. (That way madness lies.)

]]> By: Chris Heidel https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1009 Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:56:39 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1009 I cut way back on email and social media for two weeks. Gave myself just 15 minutes in the AM and PM for email. Finally got to the empty inbox spending less than half the amount of time I usually do–WOW. I’m already a GTDer, but adding the time pressure sent me into GTD laser focus. Thanks for the reminder on how it’s done!

]]> By: Angelique https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1008 Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:55:51 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1008 Vivian, Thanks so much for this. I will definitely try that. Another thing I was thinking about, with the “Spotlight” search feature of MAC, I actually may not need to duplicate them. If I just add a “@Current Projects” folder to my actions section and a “Completed Projects” folder to my reference section, that may do the trick.

I used to use Outlook and I’m still trying to figure out OmniFocus, so I’m back to the drawing board in a few ways when it comes to GTD.

My biggest problem with GTD is the ‘sticktuitiveness’ that this system requires.

Looks like time for another list….

“What to do each and every morning as soon as I sit down at my desk in the morning.”

I work out of my home, so it’s SO easy to get distracted, especially now that my kids are out of school for the summer.

I WILL perfect this system!!! So far it’s changed my life in SO many ways!!

Thank you for everything David and crew!!!!

]]> By: Anders https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1007 Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:15:52 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1007 If you have Gmail you can sort the mail with separate labels and archive it, it will show up in both folders.

]]> By: Catherine B https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/06/how-to-weed-wack-your-inbox-down-to-zero/#comment-1006 Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:18:06 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=1676#comment-1006 I love all of your products and this has given me new inspiration to streamline my e-mail practices!

Thank you for all that you do!

]]>