Comments on: Tricks for capturing Waiting For emails https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors David Allen's GTD® Methodology Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:41:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Brooke https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-104070 Thu, 11 Jul 2019 04:41:13 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-104070 I set this up on gmail, but the e-mail won’t leave my Inbox. It goes into the @WAITING FOR folder, but it stays in the Inbox.
Any ideas?
Have I set it up incorrectly?
Thanks!

]]>
By: Josh https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1729 Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:20:22 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1729 Zhu – You could put an exclusion in the rule. For instance, if a certain flag is set then the outgoing mail won’t be sent to the wf folder.

I have another question for everyone. I have been using this Outlook rule for years and would like to share it with others at my company. I realize though that the @wf tag only works if you are the only one who uses it at your company. How would you recommend setting this up so that it can be used by multiple people? I guess you could use the signature idea and make the tag a long string that would not be chosen by others. Any other ideas?

]]>
By: Chris N https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1728 Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:25:02 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1728 Jepo Mat, THANK YOU! Perfect.

]]>
By: zhu https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1727 Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:49:32 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1727 Hi guys

I applied this for my outlook mails, but I realised there are times when the response has come and that you want to give a reply to acknowledgement them for their assistance.

when u reply, outlook processes the email again and put the mail into @waiting for.

i believe it is because of the @waiting character in the previous email. is there wahy to make outlook only scan through mails for the reply that is sent?

]]>
By: Jepo Mat https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1726 Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:22:25 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1726 In Outlook, I have set-up a rule which copies any message I send with low importance to my “Waiting for” folder and resets the importance to normal.

So, when I am about to send a message for which I expect a reply, I simply click on the “Low Importance” button in the new message window and then hit the “Send” button.

Now, in my weekly review I go through the “Waiting for” and delete any message for which I received a response in the past week. I also do that sometimes as I receive the response (by e-mail or phone or in person).

This is the one-click solution I use. Anyone like it ?

__
BTW, I never send anything with low importance. Anyone ever received a message with low importance ?

]]>
By: Creer https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1725 Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:31:09 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1725 I agree with Dan Boschen, flag method is one of the best here because it doesn’t need any separate or additional folder for sent emails where you will be able to track your sent emails waiting for reply.
It also doesn’t need adding special code (*wf) inside your message or send it to cc/bcc (special, separate) email account which allows you create some filter methods to put finally your waiting message in other folder.

With flags idea it’s pretty fast, easy and reasonably convenient. You just send email, after that you open Sent folder in your email account and what you have to do is only add flag mark next to sent message, et voila, done.
When you get answer for this mail, just remove flag mark for this message. KISS.

]]>
By: Thomas Damgaard https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1724 Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:51:27 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1724 Do you have a list for Mozilla Thunderbird?

]]>
By: Kamlesh jethwa https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1723 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:39:24 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1723 hi experts ,
can someone let me know how to get an email or popup aleart or some kind of indication,if an email with specific subject say ‘Completed’ has not come in my inbox.
i.e if an email with subject ‘completed’ is not shown up as regular days ,then there should be some audio visual aleart.
is such thing configurable ?

regards,
Kamlesh

]]>
By: Sally K https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1722 Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:56:12 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1722 @Carl Robinson

In reference to your wish to set up your organizing system on your Mac, I have been using a similar system on my Mac. I use Microsoft’s Entourage as my e-mail client. The “rules” for scanning incoming and outgoing messages were easy to setup and all of my “-wf” messages are moved to my @WaitingFor folder. Since reading your post I edited my incoming rule to trigger a pop up message. The action to make that work is “Display dialog.” Entourage does not have the macro function but does support Apple Scripts. I found a ready to go script “Insert Note” to automate the insertion of the “-wf” text. The only Caveat is that the graying out of the text doesn’t hold so I must manually change the color. Alternatively, the cue can be added to your signature.

]]>
By: Carl Robinson https://gettingthingsdone.com/2009/12/tricks-for-capturing-waiting-fors/#comment-1721 Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:13:28 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/?p=2464#comment-1721 PS: looking at what is waiting for moderation, I see some text went missing – I’ll repeat the set up here:

– set up a rule for which ALL the following are true:
– message ‘is’ from (be sure to set this one as ‘is’ rather than ‘contains’) ‘myemailaddress’
– message ‘contains’ text ‘mywaitingforstring’ (in my case *wf*)

If all the above are true:
– move message to @waiting for folder.

Ta Dah! Done.

]]>