Comments on: Priorities and GTD https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=priorities-and-gtd David Allen's GTDĀ® Methodology Thu, 30 Aug 2018 22:29:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Quinalla https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-90504 Wed, 08 Aug 2018 19:54:20 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-90504 Yes, some of the prioritizing does come when things are being processed. I see a few things here that I think you are missing:
1. The weekly review – here you will look over everything once a week. You’ll see all your items then and if a deadline is looming, etc. you can adjust to move things to your calendar, etc. as needed. With this, you don’t really need week or monthly planning, you are figuring that out during your weekly review.
2. I do think you are applying contexts too rigidly. The home, work, phone/calls, etc. are a good starting point, but sometimes if one list is getting too long, you may have to break it up or move some items to Agendas depending what makes sense. Right now I have a Work – Billable, Work – Non-billable and Work – Quiet for contexts along with several agendas for weekly meetings or when I catch certain people and frankly, I can do all of that work from home that isn’t in person agendas since I can remote log in, so I could have it on my Home list if I wanted to, but I don’t because splitting it up this way is the right contexts for me and my Home list would be too long. I only have so much time a week I can put to Non-billable, so I separate it off so I can plan that time accordingly. Work – Quiet I need to either be working from home alone or in early/staying late alone to get that high focus work done.
One of David’s books he mentions someone who made their lists based on energy available as for them it was more important to have it grouped that way. Others have mentioned adding tags or something similar to sort items you want to do today to the top. So have some flexibility in your contexts and look at what you need to look at, don’t feel you have to be rigid and only look at work, if you are willing to change contexts, you may want to quickly review all your lists. Or have a tentative plan for the day/week and adjust on the fly as needed. Or if you have a project that is just that important, maybe it gets its own agenda?
3. You are missing an important point of GTD which is you should be prioritizing from your lists on the fly as that is something the brain is great at doing on an external stored list. As things come up or change, priorities are constantly changing. Having everything you need to do on lists will allow you to continually evaluate priorities.

]]>
By: Kelly Forrister https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85493 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:50:39 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85493 In reply to Nate.

Hi Nate!

Happy to elaborate more.

You asked: Would you please elaborate on how you might treat a high-priority next action or project differently when clarifying and organizing vs. low priority ones?

The prioritizing I’m doing during clarifying starts by asking, “Is it actionable?” Yes or No are the only answers to that. “NO” options are trash, reference, or incubate (Someday/Maybe or Calendar Tickler). If “YES”, the next question to ask is, “What’s the Next Action?” There are 3 choices about what to do with it then: Do now (if it will take less than two minutes), delegate (can someone else do this?), or defer (move to calendar or Next Actions lists). What I think you’re asking is fine tuning under defer. You know it’s actionable, but you can’t do it in the moment, and you’re choosing not to delegate it. So your choices for defer would be to put it on your calendar if it needs to be done ON a day, or on a next actions list sorted by context if it needs to be done BY or ANY day. That’s your call based on when you think you can/should work on this. Then taking it a cut further, to delineate it as a higher priority item, I use due dates–but sparingly. Don’t get caught in a trap of fake due dates. I use them judiciously, so when I see one I really take notice.

Then day-to-day, I’m looking at my calendar daily for actions that need to be done on a day or at a time. I’m looking at my Next Actions lists any chance I get. I sort my lists by due date so they rise to the top.

I did two webinars on GTDConnect.com you might get value from too called “The Art of Choosing Yes” and “The Art of Choosing No”. The free trial will give you access to those recordings.

Hope that helps!

Kelly

]]>
By: Simon Potton https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85420 Sun, 11 Mar 2018 00:05:41 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85420 In reply to Simon Potton.

It seems I was not quite correct about GTD and (non-project) planning – this is from ‘Getting Things Done’, the book (P98 in my e-book):

“First, constant new input and shifting tactical priorities reconfigure daily work so consistently that it’s virtually impossible to nail down to-do items ahead of time. Having a working game plan as preference point is always useful, but it must be able to be renegotiated at any moment.”

So, the value of having a plan to begin with is acknowledged.

I see I have strayed off topic, from ‘Priorities and GTD’ into ‘Planning and GTD’, but I take comfort in David Drake’s post, which shows that these aspects are related.

]]>
By: Nate https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85395 Sat, 10 Mar 2018 01:34:31 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85395 In reply to Kelly Forrister.

Kelly,

Would you please elaborate on how you might treat a high-priority next action or project differently when clarifying and organizing vs. low priority ones? It would be nice if medium and low-priority projects could all get relegated to someday/maybe, but they may become high priority and need to be addressed before my next weekly review. I know that David says that when you really mature your thinking, everything you aren’t doing this very minute is a someday/maybe. Clearly my thinking has room for growth :)

Thanks,

Nate

]]>
By: Nate https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85394 Sat, 10 Mar 2018 01:27:08 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85394 In reply to Rob.

Rob,

You make many excellent points about the importance of priority when choosing what to do now. In my opinion, priority is difficult to track because it is subject to change, whereas context usually is not. What seemed most important yesterday might not still be most important today. What required a phone yesterday probably still requires a phone today. Further, if I am on an airplane and want to be productive, I really don’t need to look at my @calls list, because that just isn’t an option until we land no matter how high of a priority I think a particular call is.

I keep my lists in Outlook Tasks and have a !Today category that self sorts to the top. I apply this category to high-priority tasks that need to get done today, in addition to the category of whatever context I applied when I entered that particular next action into my system, so it shows up on both lists. If something is no longer a !Today level priority but still needs to get done eventually, I remove the !Today tag and it stays in the original context list.

I agree with you that we shouldn’t get too rigid about choosing from contexts as they are often (but not always), flexible given the importance of a competing priority. Intuitive decision making based on a relatively recent, “weekly” review of all lists should take priority over contexts whenever possible.

Thanks,

Nate

]]>
By: Roman https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85364 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:24:41 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85364 One approach to solving this riddle I’ve been considering is the “Only 10s” approach, or the “If it’s not a heck yes!, the it’s a ‘No'” approach – in other words, everything by default goes into the “someday/maybe” list. Unless it becomes a “must”, in which case it migrates into an appropriate context, purely to ease planning, but knowing that it will get done in the very near future. In that respect, priority always comes FIRST.

]]>
By: Darrell Venture https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85354 Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:33:34 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85354 Read The Power of Less – best book on the subject in my opinion and has made a great impact upon my ability to prioritize and manage tasks

]]>
By: Rob https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85275 Wed, 07 Mar 2018 06:00:30 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85275 In reply to Kelly Forrister.

Hi Kelly,

Thanks for your reply. I’ve listened to the GTD audio book at least 5 times, and I always have trouble listening to the part where David talks about how one should approach deciding what to do. It is made very clear: you ALWAYS consider context first… and should ALWAYS consider priority last… no flexibility.

I think one of the problems is that an action’s priority is not formally tracked in GTD…
perhaps because it is so dynamic, and because it is relative to other actions being tracked. For that matter, the time and energy required to do an action are also not formally tracked in GTD. Yet, each time we need to decide what to do (by reviewing actions in a context list), we must determine these things again and again. This seems redundant, since the time and energy required don’t change each time you review that action. Maybe the reason these things aren’t tracked in GTD is because they would make GTD become too “heavy”, where the process becomes tedious?

However, what if an action’s priority WERE tracked in GTD? Would it be valuable for one to review a list of ones highest priority actions (independent from context)? I personally think this would be extremely valuable! I’d have less stress wondering whether my focus is on the most important actions.

GTD emphasizes the importance of getting things out of your head; however, if I’m always concerned that I’m not working on the most important things (because my system doesn’t offer an easy way to identify them), then I will trust my system less. This has been one of the biggest hindrances to my becoming fully engaged in GTD, and I’m hoping to find a solution because I really do recognize the great power it offers.

Rob

]]>
By: Simon Potton https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85257 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:28:00 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85257 Thank you for the translation, Juan Carlos. Some good points, upon which I shall ponder..

]]>
By: David Drake https://gettingthingsdone.com/2018/03/priorities-and-gtd/#comment-85256 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:25:46 +0000 https://gettingthingsdone.com/?p=16680#comment-85256 In reply to Rob.

I really like your comments, Rob. I resolve some of these issues by creating time blocks on my calendar for projects and major tasks that I consider high priority, regardless of context. As you stated, I will make sure that when that time block arrives, I have everything — the appropriate tools — to be able to execute on that project of task.

]]>