Comments on: eProductivity Equation: KWP = M x T x K https://gettingthingsdone.com/2008/06/eproductivity-equation-kwp-m-x-t-x-k/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=eproductivity-equation-kwp-m-x-t-x-k David Allen's GTD® Methodology Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:33:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Sam https://gettingthingsdone.com/2008/06/eproductivity-equation-kwp-m-x-t-x-k/#comment-383 Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:37:17 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/2008/06/04/eproductivity-equation-kwp-m-x-t-x-k/#comment-383 Jeroen, the graphic is from a European Union research project call APOSDLE (Advanced Process-Oriented Self-Directed Learning Environment). The text reads as follows:

WP I. Work Processes
WP II. Self-Directed Learning
WP III. Contextualized Collaboration
WP IV. Integrated Knowledge Structure
WP V. Semantic Spaces
WP VI. Requirements, Application & Evaluation

I dumped all of that into Google… These seem to be the six work packages the project is producing.

There’s quite a cool trailer for the system on their website: http://aposdle.tugraz.at/design/aposdle/images/aposdle_video.htm

I’d love something like that at my workplace!

Sam

]]> By: Eric Mack https://gettingthingsdone.com/2008/06/eproductivity-equation-kwp-m-x-t-x-k/#comment-382 Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:34:49 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/2008/06/04/eproductivity-equation-kwp-m-x-t-x-k/#comment-382 Jeroen, the graphic was provided by the host of this blog; I do not have it. It’s for illustrative purposes anyway. What’s important (at least I think so) is the formula. I’m glad you enjoyed the post. Eric

]]> By: Jeroen Sangers https://gettingthingsdone.com/2008/06/eproductivity-equation-kwp-m-x-t-x-k/#comment-381 Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:54:48 +0000 http://www.gtdtimes.com/2008/06/04/eproductivity-equation-kwp-m-x-t-x-k/#comment-381 Great formula! I was interested in the image you used in this post, but can’t decipher the text. Can you link it to a bigger version and explain it a little bit more, or will that come in future posts?

]]>